Independent Assessment of the Children's Hepatic Tumors International Collaboration Risk Stratification for Hepatoblastoma and the Association of Tumor Histological Characteristics With Prognosis.

Importance: Hepatoblastoma is the most common pediatric liver malignant neoplasm, and accurate risk stratification is essential for guiding treatment. Objective: To validate the Children's Hepatic Tumors International Collaboration-Hepatoblastoma Stratification (CHIC-HS) in an independent cohort of patients with hepatoblastoma and evaluate the association of pretreatment hepatoblastoma histological subtype with prognosis. Design, Setting, and Participants: This is a single-institution retrospective cohort study of 96 pediatric patients with hepatoblastoma diagnosed and treated between June 1, 2000, and December 31, 2016, with recent therapy and independent of the CHIC-HS discovery cohort. Each patient was assigned a risk group according to CHIC-HS. The histological characteristics of each tumor were assessed based on the International Pediatric Liver Tumor Consensus Classification. Data were analyzed from May 2018 to May 2019. Main Outcomes And Measures: The main outcomes were event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS). Cox regression analysis was used to examine the associations of patient characteristics and tumor histological characteristics with survival. Results: A total of 96 patients (median [range] age, 1.9 [0.4-18] years; 36 [38%] girls and 60 [63%] boys) were assessed, including 15 with very low risk, 28 with low risk, 23 with intermediate risk, and 30 with high risk, according to CHIC-HS criteria. There were a total of 13 cancer-related deaths; median (range) follow-up was 3.5 (0.1-17.8) years for those alive at the last follow-up. The estimated 5-year OS rates were 100% in the very low-risk group, 94.7% (95% CI, 68.1%-99.2%) in the low-risk group, 89.2% (95% CI, 63.1%-97.2%) in the intermediate-risk group, and 57.9% (95% CI, 34.6%-75.5%) in the high-risk group. In a multivariable analysis, we confirmed that CHIC-HS significantly estimated EFS (high-risk group vs very low- and low-risk groups: hazard ratio [HR], 45.59; 95% CI, 9.39-209.5; P < .001) and OS (high-risk group vs very low- and low-risk groups: HR, 21.95; 95% CI, 2.76-174.29; P < .001). In the subcohort of 84 patients for whom pretreatment tumor histological data were available, tumor epithelial histological subtypes were found to be significantly associated with both EFS and OS. Patients in the CHIC-HS high-risk group and with embryonal-only histological subtype had the highest risk of relapse or disease progression (high-risk: HR, 42.62; 95% CI, 9.91-203.9; embryonal: HR, 3.28; 95% CI, 1.21-8.9) and death (high-risk: HR, 18.78; 95% CI, 2.31-152.84; embryonal: HR, 7.12; 95% CI, 1.51-33.52). Conclusions and Relevance: This cohort study found that CHIC-HS performed as expected in an independent cohort that was more recently treated. Incorporation of pretreatment tumor histological data into CHIC-HS may provide additional prognostic value.

Optimal Method for Reporting Prostate Cancer Grade in MRI-targeted Biopsies.

When multiple cores are biopsied from a single magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-targeted lesion, Gleason grade may be assigned for each core separately or for all cores of the lesion in aggregate. Because of the potential for disparate grades, an optimal method for pathology reporting MRI lesion grade awaits validation. We examined our institutional experience on the concordance of biopsy grade with subsequent radical prostatectomy (RP) grade of targeted lesions when grade is determined on individual versus aggregate core basis. For 317 patients (with 367 lesions) who underwent MRI-targeted biopsy followed by RP, targeted lesion grade was assigned as (1) global Grade Group (GG), aggregated positive cores; (2) highest GG (highest grade in single biopsy core); and (3) largest volume GG (grade in the core with longest cancer linear length). The 3 biopsy grades were compared (equivalence, upgrade, or downgrade) with the final grade of the lesion in the RP, using κ and weighted κ coefficients. The biopsy global, highest, and largest GGs were the same as the final RP GG in 73%, 68%, 62% cases, respectively (weighted κ: 0.77, 0.79, and 0.71). For cases where the targeted lesion biopsy grade scores differed from each other when assigned by global, highest, and largest GG, the concordance with the targeted lesion RP GG was 69%, 52%, 31% for biopsy global, highest, and largest GGs tumors (weighted κ: 0.65, 0.68, 0.59). Overall, global, highest, and largest GG of the targeted biopsy show substantial agreement with RP-targeted lesion GG, however targeted global GG yields slightly better agreement than either targeted highest or largest GG. This becomes more apparent in nearly one third of cases when each of the 3 targeted lesion level biopsy scores differ. These results support the use of global (aggregate) GG for reporting of MRI lesion-targeted biopsies, while further validations are awaited.

Impact of prostate biopsy secondary pathology review on radiotherapy management.

BACKGROUND: The Gleason scoring system is the most widely used method to assess prostate adenocarcinoma pathology however interobserver variability is significant. Gleason score, PSA level, and clinical stage comprise the NCCN risk stratification that guides treatment decision making. Given the importance of an accurate Gleason score and wide interobserver variability, referral centers routinely review outside pathology at the time of consultation. We sought to address the impact a secondary pathology review had on radiation therapy treatment recommendations in men with prostate cancer at our institution. METHODS: We retrospectively collected patient data on 342 patients seen at our institution from January 2012 to December 2018. Clinicopathologic data were used to subdivide patients into risk groups and available treatment options per NCCN criteria. Cases reviewed by our genitourinary pathologist (GUP) were compared with reports from outside pathologists. Inter-rater reliability between pathologists was assessed with weighted Cohen's kappa statistic and agreement of treatment options was determined by McNemar's exact tests. RESULTS: GUP scored more cores positive in 16.47% of cases on secondary review. Primary Gleason score was changed in 12.28% of patients and secondary score in 26.02% of cases. Total Gleason score was different in 29.24% of cases, 19.01% were downgraded and 10.23% upgraded. The weighted kappa statistic was 0.759 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.711, 0.807). 18.77% of patients were assigned to a different NCCN risk group following secondary review. The weighted kappa statistic comparing NCCN risk stratification was 0.802 (95% CI: 0.754, 0.850). Secondary review influenced radiation therapy recommendations pertaining to brachytherapy boost and androgen deprivation therapy in men with high risk disease (χ2 = 5.33, p = 0.0386; χ2 = 8.05, p = 0.0072, respectively). Kappa statistic was found to be highest when GUP assessed high-risk disease versus all other categories (κ = 0.823, 95% CI: 0.750, 0.895). CONCLUSIONS: We found nearly one in five men (18.7%) was assigned a different NCCN risk group and thus offered potentially different treatment options after a secondary pathology review at our institution. Given the inherent nature of prostate cancer and lung disease-specific survival associated with modern therapies, our study demonstrates the importance of a secondary pathology review and its potential impact on radiation therapy recommendations.

Analysis of interobserver reproducibility in grading dysplastic nevi: Results of the application of the 2018 World Health Organization grading criteria.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to determine whether the histopathological grading of dysplastic nevi is an objective endeavor, considering interobserver variability, according to 2018 World Health Organization (WHO) criteria. METHODS: In total, 179 cases of dysplastic nevi, with high and moderate degree of atypia, diagnosed and graded according to the previous criteria were reviewed by three pathologists. Then, the observers graded the dysplastic nevi as low or high according to 2018 WHO criteria. RESULTS: Grading of dysplastic nevi was in complete agreement in 99 out of 179 cases across three observers with a fair level of overall interobserver agreement (multirater κfree : 0.40). The observers showed moderate to good agreement for most of the architectural features, except for criteria regarding focal continuous basal proliferation of melanocytes, density of non-nested junctional melanocytes, and presence of dyscohesive nests of intraepidermal melanocytes, whereas fair agreement was achieved for the cytological criteria. CONCLUSIONS: The 2018 WHO criteria for dysplastic nevus will ensure a common approach to the diagnosis and grading of dysplastic nevi. However, histopathological criteria, such as cytological features and focal continuous basal proliferation of melanocytes, should be improved so as to ensure a more accurate surgical approach and risk assessment.

Concordance of biopsy and pathologic ISUP grading in salvage radical prostatectomy patients for recurrent prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: To investigate the concordance of biopsy and pathologic International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grading in salvage radical prostatectomy (SRP) patients for recurrent prostate cancer. METHODS: Within a high-volume center database, we identified patients who underwent SRP for recurrent prostate cancer (PCa) between 2004 and 2020. Upgrading, downgrading, concordance, and any discordance between posttreatment biopsy ISUP and ISUP at SRP were tested. Logistic regression models were used to predict ISUP upgrading and ISUP discordance. Models were adjusted for prostatic specific antigen before SRP, age at surgery, initial prostatic specific antigen (PSA), type of primary treatment, time from primary PCa diagnosis to SRP, number of positive cores at biopsy, and original Gleason score. RESULTS: Overall, 184 patients with available biopsy and pathologic ISUP grading were identified. Of those, 17.4% (n = 32), 40.8% (n = 75), 19.6% (n = 36), and 22.2% (n = 41) harbored biopsy ISUP 1, ISUP 2, ISUP 3, and ISUP 4-5 grading, respectively. Pathologic ISUP 1, ISUP 2, ISUP 3, and ISUP 4-5 grading was recorded in 6.0% (n = 11), 40.8% (n = 75), 32.1% (n = 59), and 21.2% (n = 39), respectively. Median PSA before SRP was 5.5 ng/ml (interquartile range [IQR]: 3.1-8.1 ng/ml), median age at SRP was 65.1 years (IQR:60.7-69.4 years) and median time from original PCa diagnosis to SRP was 47 months (IQR: 27.3-85.2 months). Concordance of biopsy and pathologic ISUP was identified in 45.1% (n = 83). Conversely, any ISUP discordance, upgrading and downgrading of at least one ISUP group was identified in 54.9% (n = 101), 35.3% (n = 65), and 19.6% (n = 36). In logistic models, none of the preoperative characteristics was associated with upgrading or ISUP discordance (all p > 0.1). CONCLUSION: Discordance between biopsy and pathologic ISUP grading is common at SRP. However, in 45% of SRP cases biopsy ISUP is capable to predict pathologic ISUP. Further studies are necessary to identify characteristics for ISUP upgrading at SRP.

Classification and Reliability of Lumbar Facet Cysts Grading Scales.

BACKGROUND: The presence of symptomatic lumbar facet cysts has been associated with segmental instability. Given this association, decompression versus decompression with fusion is a frequently debated topic. Multiple grading scales have been devised to identify patients at high risk for development of cyst recurrence; however, there exists no external evaluation of these scales. METHODS: A retrospective review of 54 patients undergoing initial treatment for lumbar synovial cysts at a single institution over the past 12 years was conducted. Surgical treatment consisted of decompression with cystectomy without fusion. Patients were assessed and classified according to the NeuroSpine Surgery Research Group (NSURG) and Rosenstock Classification systems. Five neurosurgeons reviewed the preoperative magnetic resonance images, and results were classified. Interrater reliability was assessed using both Gwet's AC1 coefficient and Krippendorff's alpha. A 1-way analysis of variance was used to evaluate predictive ability of both classification systems. RESULTS: In total, of the 54 patients who underwent decompression, 7 had cyst recurrence. Overall cyst recurrence was most common in NSURG grade 2 cysts (3/12, 25%) followed by grade 1 cysts (4/27, 14.8%). Of the NSURG grade 3 and 4 patients, none had cyst recurrence. In the Rosenstock grades the most common recurrence was in grade 3 cysts (1/4, 25%) followed by grade 1 cysts (5/26, 19.2%). Interrater reliability demonstrated good reproducibility on Gwet's AC1 and Krippendorff's alpha on both grading scales. Neither score was predictive of cyst recurrence (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The Rosenstock and NeuroSpine scores demonstrate good overall interrater reliability but are inconsistent in their ability to predict recurrence of lumbar facet cysts.

[Histopathologic grading of breast cancer; large variation with major consequences?] / Histopathologische gradering van het mammacarcinoom.

The pathologist's assessment of tumor tissue plays a critical role in therapeutic decision-making in early-stage invasive breast cancer. In daily practice, however, there appears to be considerable variation in grading between the different Dutch pathology laboratories and between individual pathologists within the same laboratory. This underlines the need to standardize grading by pathologists as much as possible in order to minimize the risk of a worse outcome for patients due to under-treatment and of unnecessary toxicity from over-treatment. Therefore, two initiatives were launched, i.e. laboratory-specific feedback reports and an e-learning module in which pathologists were trained in grading of invasive breast cancer. While these initiatives have yielded encouraging results, the overall variation in grading remains significant. Awareness of this variation, and of the inherent difficulties of subjective grading, among the various clinicians involved in breast cancer management, is therefore of utmost importance to improve clinical decision-making for patients.

A-kinase interacting protein 1 is sufficiently expressed and positively associates with WHO grade, meanwhile predicts unfavorable overall survival independently in glioma patients.

ABSTRACT: The present study aimed to investigate the association of A-kinase interacting protein 1 (AKIP1) with clinical characteristics, and further explore the prognostic value of AKIP1 in glioma patients.Totally 168 glioma patients who underwent tumor resection were analyzed, and their tumor tissue specimens were acquired for the detection of AKIP1 expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC), which was scored by a semi-quantitative method considering staining intensity and staining density.According to AKIP1 expression in tumor tissues of glioma patients, there were 65 (38.7%) patients with AKIP1 low expression (IHC score 0-3), 48 (28.6%) patients with AKIP1 high + expression (IHC score 4-6), 42 (25.0%) patients with AKIP1 high++ expression (IHC score 7-9) and 13 (7.7%) patients with AKIP1 high+++ expression (IHC score 10-12), respectively. AKIP1 expression was positively associated with World Health Organization grade. Overall survival (OS) was the lowest in the patients with AKIP1 high+++ expression, followed by those with AKIP1 high++ expression and those with AKIP1 high+ expression, and highest in those with AKIP1 low expression. Further subgroup analysis exhibited that AKIP1 expression was negatively associated with OS especially in high-grade glioma patients. In addition, AKIP1 expression was negatively associated with OS in all subgroups of patients with/without adjuvant radiotherapy, with/without adjuvant chemotherapy. Further multivariate Cox's regression exhibited that AKIP1 high expression was an independent predictive factor for worse OS.AKIP1 presents with the potential to be a novel biomarker for tumor management and prognosis surveillance in glioma patients.

Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy in Oral Cancer Diagnosis.

Oral cancer is one of the most common cancers worldwide. Despite easy access to the oral cavity and significant advances in treatment, the morbidity and mortality rates for oral cancer patients are still very high, mainly due to late-stage diagnosis when treatment is less successful. Oral cancer has also been found to be the most expensive cancer to treat in the United States. Early diagnosis of oral cancer can significantly improve patient survival rate and reduce medical costs. There is an urgent unmet need for an accurate and sensitive molecular-based diagnostic tool for early oral cancer detection. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy has gained increasing attention in cancer research due to its ability to elucidate qualitative and quantitative information of biochemical content and molecular-level structural changes in complex biological systems. The diagnosis of a disease is based on biochemical changes underlying the disease pathology rather than morphological changes of the tissue. It is a versatile method that can work with tissues, cells, or body fluids. In this review article, we aim to summarize the studies of infrared spectroscopy in oral cancer research and detection. It provides early evidence to support the potential application of infrared spectroscopy as a diagnostic tool for oral potentially malignant and malignant lesions. The challenges and opportunities in clinical translation are also discussed.

Intraoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Low-Grade and High-Grade Gliomas: What Is the Evidence? A Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: The benefit of intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (iMRI) in gliomas remains unclear. We performed a meta-analysis of outcomes with iMRI-guided surgery in high-grade gliomas (HGGs) and low-grade gliomas (LGGs). METHODS: Databases were searched until November 29, 2018 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies (OBS) comparing iMRI use with conventional neurosurgery. Pooled risk ratios (RRs) or hazard ratios were evaluated with the random-effects model. Outcomes included extent of resection (EOR), gross total resection (GTR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and length of surgery (LOS), stratified by study design and glioma grade. RESULTS: Fifteen articles (3 RCTs and 12 OBS) were included. In RCTs, GTR was higher in iMRI compared with conventional neurosurgery (RR, 1.42; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.17-1.73; I2, 7%) overall, for LGGs (1.91; 95% CI, 1.19-3.06), but not HGGs (1.24; 95% CI, 0.89-1.73), with no difference in EOR, PFS, OS, and LOS. For OBS, GTR was higher (RR, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.43-1.90; I2, 4%) overall, and for LGGs (1.63; 95% CI, 1.17-2.28; I2, 0%) and HGGs (1.62; 95% CI, 1.36-1.92; I2, 19%). EOR was greater with iMRI (6%; 95% CI, 4%-8%; I2, 44%) overall, in LGGs (5%; 95% CI, 2%-8%; I2, 37%) and HGGs (7%; 95% CI, 4%-10%; I2, 13%). There was no difference in PFS, OS, and LOS with iMRI. CONCLUSIONS: IMRI use improved GTR in gliomas, including LGGs. However, no PFS and OS benefit was shown in the meta-analysis.

The 2019 Genitourinary Pathology Society (GUPS) White Paper on Contemporary Grading of Prostate Cancer.

CONTEXT.­: Controversies and uncertainty persist in prostate cancer grading. OBJECTIVE.­: To update grading recommendations. DATA SOURCES.­: Critical review of the literature along with pathology and clinician surveys. CONCLUSIONS.­: Percent Gleason pattern 4 (%GP4) is as follows: (1) report %GP4 in needle biopsy with Grade Groups (GrGp) 2 and 3, and in needle biopsy on other parts (jars) of lower grade in cases with at least 1 part showing Gleason score (GS) 4 + 4 = 8; and (2) report %GP4: less than 5% or less than 10% and 10% increments thereafter. Tertiary grade patterns are as follows: (1) replace "tertiary grade pattern" in radical prostatectomy (RP) with "minor tertiary pattern 5 (TP5)," and only use in RP with GrGp 2 or 3 with less than 5% Gleason pattern 5; and (2) minor TP5 is noted along with the GS, with the GrGp based on the GS. Global score and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-targeted biopsies are as follows: (1) when multiple undesignated cores are taken from a single MRI-targeted lesion, an overall grade for that lesion is given as if all the involved cores were one long core; and (2) if providing a global score, when different scores are found in the standard and the MRI-targeted biopsy, give a single global score (factoring both the systematic standard and the MRI-targeted positive cores). Grade Groups are as follows: (1) Grade Groups (GrGp) is the terminology adopted by major world organizations; and (2) retain GS 3 + 5 = 8 in GrGp 4. Cribriform carcinoma is as follows: (1) report the presence or absence of cribriform glands in biopsy and RP with Gleason pattern 4 carcinoma. Intraductal carcinoma (IDC-P) is as follows: (1) report IDC-P in biopsy and RP; (2) use criteria based on dense cribriform glands (>50% of the gland is composed of epithelium relative to luminal spaces) and/or solid nests and/or marked pleomorphism/necrosis; (3) it is not necessary to perform basal cell immunostains on biopsy and RP to identify IDC-P if the results would not change the overall (highest) GS/GrGp part per case; (4) do not include IDC-P in determining the final GS/GrGp on biopsy and/or RP; and (5) "atypical intraductal proliferation (AIP)" is preferred for an intraductal proliferation of prostatic secretory cells which shows a greater degree of architectural complexity and/or cytological atypia than typical high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia, yet falling short of the strict diagnostic threshold for IDC-P. Molecular testing is as follows: (1) Ki67 is not ready for routine clinical use; (2) additional studies of active surveillance cohorts are needed to establish the utility of PTEN in this setting; and (3) dedicated studies of RNA-based assays in active surveillance populations are needed to substantiate the utility of these expensive tests in this setting. Artificial intelligence and novel grading schema are as follows: (1) incorporating reactive stromal grade, percent GP4, minor tertiary GP5, and cribriform/intraductal carcinoma are not ready for adoption in current practice.

Prognostic significance of the MDM2/HMGA2 ratio and histological tumor grade in dedifferentiated liposarcoma.

Dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DDLPS) is a relatively common soft tissue sarcoma that results from the progression of well-differentiated liposarcoma (WDLPS). This study aimed to investigate the progression process and to clarify the pathological and genetic factors related to poor prognosis in DDLPS. In 32 DDLPS cases and five WDLPS cases, genetic factors were analyzed by custom comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) array, which was designed to densely cover gene regions known to be frequently amplified in WD/DDLPS. The analyses comparing primary and metastatic lesions and those comparing histologically different areas in the same tumor revealed intra-tumoral genetic heterogeneity and progression. According to a prognostic analysis comparing the good-prognosis and the poor-prognosis groups, we selected MDM2 and HMGA2 as candidate genes associated with poor and good prognosis, respectively. The ratios of the amplification or gain levels of MDM2 and HMGA2 expressed in log ratios (log[MDM2/HMGA2] = log[MDM2]-log[HMGA2]) were significantly associated with prognosis. An amplification or gain level of MDM2 that was more than twice that of HMGA2 (MDM2/HMGA2 > 2, log[MDM2/HMGA2] > 1) was strongly related to poor OS (P < .001) and poor distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) (P < .001). In the pathological analysis of 44 cases of DDLPS, histological tumor grade, cellular atypia, and MDM2 immunoreactivity were related to overall survival (OS), while HMGA2 immunoreactivity tended to be associated with OS. Cellular atypia was also associated with DMFS. In conclusion, histological grade and MDM2 expression were determined to be prognostically important, and the MDM2/HMGA2 amplification or gain ratio was found to have significant prognostic value by the custom CGH array analysis.

Worst pattern of invasion - type 4 (WPOI-4) and Lymphocyte host response should be mandatory reporting criteria for oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma: A re-look at the American Joint Committee of Cancer (AJCC) minimum dataset.

BACKGROUND: A proportion of early-stage node-negative oral squamous carcinoma patients fail despite complete surgical resection. Adjuvant treatment in early oral cancer is controversial and is often individualized based on stage, depth, and margin status. AIMS: We reviewed various histological markers in pT1/T2N0 cases, resected upfront with elective nodal dissection, with an emphasis on tumor-tissue interface characteristics of the worst pattern of invasion (WPOI), tumor cell nest size (sCNS), budding and lymphocytic host response (LHR), to assess their prognostic significance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Archived blocks of 95 cases were reviewed. Tumor stage, grade, size, depth of invasion, lymphovascular, and perineural invasion, WPOI, LHR, sCNS, and tumor bud (single cells or <5 cell clusters) score were recorded. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Prognostic significance was statistically analyzed using SPSS software version 20. RESULTS: Depth of invasion (P = 0.008), WPOI- 4 and 5 (P = 0.033), sCNS (<5 cells) at tumor interface (P = 0.010), high bud count (≥3 buds/40 × hpf) (P = 0.021) and poor LHR (P = 0.019) correlated significantly with poor disease-free survival on univariate analysis. However, on multivariate analysis only LHR and WPOI-4 (that is presence of small cell nests or buds) were significant, with high hazard ratio of 4.351 (95% CI 1.290-14.676, P = 0.018) and 5.019 (95% CI 1.212-20.789, P = 0.026), respectively. CONCLUSION: We propose mandatory reporting of WPOI-4 at the tumor interface and absence of LHR, as significant markers of poor prognosis in early-stage oral cavity squamous carcinoma.

Comparison of different anti-Ki67 antibody clones and hot-spot sizes for assessing proliferative index and grading in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours using manual and image analysis.

AIMS: Ki67 proliferative index (PI) is essential for grading gastroenteric and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (GEP NETs). Analytical and preanalytical variables can affect Ki67 PI. In contrast to counting methodology, until now little attention has focused on the question of clone equivalence and the effect of hot-spot size on Ki67 PI in GEP NETs. Using manual counting and image analysis, this study compared the Ki67 PI achieved using MM1, K2 and 30-9 to MIB1, a clone which has been validated for, and is referenced in, guidelines relating to assessment of Ki67 PI in GEP NETs. METHODS AND RESULTS: Forty-two pancreatic NETs were each immunohistochemically stained for the anti-Ki67 clones MIB1, MM1, K2 and 30-9. Ki67 PI was calculated manually and by image analysis, the latter using three different hot-spot sizes. In manual comparisons using single hot-spot high-power fields, non-MIB1 clones overestimated Ki67 PI compared to MIB1, resulting in grading discordances. Image analysis shows good agreement with manual Ki67 PI but a tendency to overestimate absolute Ki67 PI. Increasing the size of tumour hot-spot from 500 to 2000 cells resulted in a decrease in Ki67 PI. CONCLUSION: Different anti-Ki67 clones do not produce equivalent PIs in GEP NETs, and clone selection may therefore affect patient care. Increasing the hot-spot size decreases the Ki67 PI. Greater standardisation in terms of antibody clone selection and hot-spot size is required for grading GEP NETs. Image analysis is an effective tool for assisting Ki67 assessment and allows easier standardisation of the size of the tumour hot-spot.

Development and Validation of a Deep Learning Algorithm for Gleason Grading of Prostate Cancer From Biopsy Specimens.

Importance: For prostate cancer, Gleason grading of the biopsy specimen plays a pivotal role in determining case management. However, Gleason grading is associated with substantial interobserver variability, resulting in a need for decision support tools to improve the reproducibility of Gleason grading in routine clinical practice. Objective: To evaluate the ability of a deep learning system (DLS) to grade diagnostic prostate biopsy specimens. Design, Setting, and Participants: The DLS was evaluated using 752 deidentified digitized images of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded prostate needle core biopsy specimens obtained from 3 institutions in the United States, including 1 institution not used for DLS development. To obtain the Gleason grade group (GG), each specimen was first reviewed by 2 expert urologic subspecialists from a multi-institutional panel of 6 individuals (years of experience: mean, 25 years; range, 18-34 years). A third subspecialist reviewed discordant cases to arrive at a majority opinion. To reduce diagnostic uncertainty, all subspecialists had access to an immunohistochemical-stained section and 3 histologic sections for every biopsied specimen. Their review was conducted from December 2018 to June 2019. Main Outcomes and Measures: The frequency of the exact agreement of the DLS with the majority opinion of the subspecialists in categorizing each tumor-containing specimen as 1 of 5 categories: nontumor, GG1, GG2, GG3, or GG4-5. For comparison, the rate of agreement of 19 general pathologists' opinions with the subspecialists' majority opinions was also evaluated. Results: For grading tumor-containing biopsy specimens in the validation set (n = 498), the rate of agreement with subspecialists was significantly higher for the DLS (71.7%; 95% CI, 67.9%-75.3%) than for general pathologists (58.0%; 95% CI, 54.5%-61.4%) (P < .001). In subanalyses of biopsy specimens from an external validation set (n = 322), the Gleason grading performance of the DLS remained similar. For distinguishing nontumor from tumor-containing biopsy specimens (n = 752), the rate of agreement with subspecialists was 94.3% (95% CI, 92.4%-95.9%) for the DLS and similar at 94.7% (95% CI, 92.8%-96.3%) for general pathologists (P = .58). Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, the DLS showed higher proficiency than general pathologists at Gleason grading prostate needle core biopsy specimens and generalized to an independent institution. Future research is necessary to evaluate the potential utility of using the DLS as a decision support tool in clinical workflows and to improve the quality of prostate cancer grading for therapy decisions.

Reappraisal of the papillary urothelial neoplasm of low malignant potential (PUNLMP).

Although the papillary urothelial neoplasm of low malignant potential (PUNLMP) diagnostic category was retained in the updated 2016 World Health Organisation (WHO) classification of tumours of the urinary system, there still exists a great deal of controversy regarding the biological behaviour of these tumours. We review PUNLMP tumours and histological grading with an emphasis on the histomorphological, genetic and clinical similarities between PUNLMP and low-grade non-invasive papillary urothelial carcinoma. A literature search using PubMed was performed. All relevant literature concerning PUNLMP and the grading of urothelial tumours was reviewed. PUNLMPs cannot be reliably distinguished from low-grade non-invasive papillary urothelial carcinomas based on the histomorphological criteria outlined in the WHO 2004/2016 classification system. PUNLMPs and low-grade non-invasive papillary urothelial carcinomas are not only morphologically similar, but also share similar molecular genetic alterations and a similar risk of recurrence and progression. In addition, there are no consensus recommendations for a different method of treatment and follow-up for these two tumour types. Attempting to distinguish PUNLMP from low-grade papillary urothelial carcinoma adds an unnecessary level of complexity to the grading and classification of urothelial tumours. We feel that PUNLMP terminology should be abandoned and that all such tumours should be classified as low-grade carcinomas until more objective determinants of clinical outcome can be established.

Pathology of meningiomas.

Meningiomas are a diverse group of neoplasms that exhibit a wide range of morphologies and clinical behavior. They are generally accepted to originate from arachnoid cap cells within the leptomeninges. Classic histologic features include whorl formations, psammoma bodies, nuclear holes, and nuclear pseudoinclusions. Meningiomas are classified as benign, atypical, or anaplastic (grades I, II, or III) based on histologic features including mitotic activity, brain invasion, and presence of other minor criteria. There are numerous histologic variants of meningiomas, and some are associated with worse clinical outcomes and therefore are assigned a higher grade. The majority of meningiomas show diffuse positivity for vimentin and epithelial membrane antigen, supporting the dual mesenchymal and epithelial nature of meningothelial cells. The presence of an elevated proliferation index (as measured by Ki-67 immunohistochemical stain) and loss of progesterone receptor expression are associated with the higher grade. Pathologic features including histologic variants, grading criteria, and ancillary tests such as special and immunohistochemical stains are discussed.

Identification of areas of grading difficulties in prostate cancer and comparison with artificial intelligence assisted grading.

The International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) hosts a reference image database supervised by experts with the purpose of establishing an international standard in prostate cancer grading. Here, we aimed to identify areas of grading difficulties and compare the results with those obtained from an artificial intelligence system trained in grading. In a series of 87 needle biopsies of cancers selected to include problematic cases, experts failed to reach a 2/3 consensus in 41.4% (36/87). Among consensus and non-consensus cases, the weighted kappa was 0.77 (range 0.68-0.84) and 0.50 (range 0.40-0.57), respectively. Among the non-consensus cases, four main causes of disagreement were identified: the distinction between Gleason score 3 + 3 with tangential cutting artifacts vs. Gleason score 3 + 4 with poorly formed or fused glands (13 cases), Gleason score 3 + 4 vs. 4 + 3 (7 cases), Gleason score 4 + 3 vs. 4 + 4 (8 cases) and the identification of a small component of Gleason pattern 5 (6 cases). The AI system obtained a weighted kappa value of 0.53 among the non-consensus cases, placing it as the observer with the sixth best reproducibility out of a total of 24. AI may serve as a decision support and decrease inter-observer variability by its ability to make consistent decisions. The grading of these cancer patterns that best predicts outcome and guides treatment warrants further clinical and genetic studies. Results of such investigations should be used to improve calibration of AI systems.